Re: [RC] [RC] LD brakes on! - lsimoni197I sure agree on that. It just does not make sense to hold LD riders more than 1/2 hour on a ride. An hour hold just means I must push the horse much faster to make cut off time. So, I ride slowly these days, and I want all the time I can get for the horse and me to complete comfortably. Please, consider more education at the ride meeting, rather than hurting the horse with more hold time, which as Carla says, "equates to riding faster." Lynge -----Original Message----- From: Carla Richardson <richardson.carla@xxxxxxxxx> To: Barbara McCrary <bigcreekranch@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Cc: Steve Shaw <sshaw@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Ridecamp <ridecamp@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Mon, 12 Nov 2007 4:47 pm Subject: Re: [RC] [RC] LD brakes on! Maybe I'm not understanding this right, but to me, the more time I'm at a hold, or the more checks and holds there are, that means I have to ride faster, not slower. If I have an hour hold (lunch stop), I have a ride time of 5 hours. If I have only a 40 minute hold I have 5 hours and 20 minutes. To someone like me, who rides slowly anyway, that makes a big difference.
If you are going to take away more riding time, by having an hour and a half, say, taken in vet checks and holds on a 25 mile ride, then I've only got 4 1/2 hours riding time.
Carla Richardson
Colorado
On 11/12/07, Barbara McCrary <bigcreekranch@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
This sounds like a pretty sharp idea. More checkpoints with PR gates would
|