![]() |
Re: [RC] Extremely disappointed (was: Mariposa Protest, etc.) - Beth WalkerOn Nov 6, 2007, at 8:49 PM, k s swigart wrote: I think a DQ from the ride would have been appropriate, and maybe a fine. I don't think a suspension would be warranted, however. I am even more disappointed by the above statements by Ridecampers (butI agree with you here, Kat. While it may be emotionally satisfying to lose your temper in such a situation, it is not the kind of behavior that should be accepted. Understood, perhaps, but not accepted or praiseworthy. On the other hand - I can admit to a high level of frustration as to what was imposed, or possibly, what the board was allowed to impose under AERC rules. For example - no protest was filed against the rider because he was not an AERC member. I don't agree with this, as this means that no action was or will be taken against this rider - including barring him from entering future rides for a period of time, or requiring that he ride with a mentor when and if he is allowed to enter another ride. Maybe he won't ever enter another ride (after the fight - I probably wouldn't). That shouldn't stop the AERC from taking positive action to show their **membership** that they are taking steps to try and avoid a repetition of this event. Putting him on a list of riders not allowed to enter rides would be one. Making him ride with a mentor would be another. Talking to his friends - who ARE members - and determining whether they have any responsibility in the matter (why didn't one of his friends ride with him?) would be another. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Ridecamp is a service of Endurance Net, http://www.endurance.net. Information, Policy, Disclaimer: http://www.endurance.net/Ridecamp Subscribe/Unsubscribe http://www.endurance.net/ridecamp/logon.asp Ride Long and Ride Safe!! =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
|