In a message dated 7/26/2006 3:01:54 PM Mountain Standard Time,
neyska@xxxxxxxxxxx writes:
I really
don't believe for a minute that he felt it would be better for the child
to have died then for the horse to have died. Any death is a tragedy.
What I got from his post was a passionate, if perhaps badly stated,
statement about our personal responsibility to these
animals.
Thanks for Nikki for your observation in this matter.
I agree with you.
Having folks sit out there in the ether and then (seemingly) waiting to
jump on a poster who happens to write too passionately, or to poorly (as in my
case) to truly state what's on their mind is bad form.
Having a dialogue, with the understanding that we're trying to work
something out here, is not a bad thing. It's what will eventually lead us
all to water.
I can't imagine losing a horse in an accident...but I REALLY can't imagine
losing a child in any manner.
