Re: [RC] re: Truman's comments on 100s - Truman PrevattYou have to put the 100's where you can put them. Except for one year (2006) the SE has had at least 8 100's every year. Some years 10, some years 9. The times haven't gotten any faster since 1996 on basically the same trails. The Far Out Forest - 100 miles of deep sugar sand was won in 1994 in 13:22 and this year in 15:06.The rise in metabolics is interesting. Maybe in the old days metabolics - electrolyte imbalance - showed up as rear end stiffness and lameness was the reason for the pull. Now today with electrolytes they go further and the metabolic issues are showing up. Maybe in the old days, the rider would pull and claim RO where now today the RO is only used for rider issues not rider thinking the horse is not right - that's a metabolic pull. Who knows - not sufficient data in the data base to address it. But what did show up was in a 50 you were more likely to be pulled for lameness than you were in a 100 and in a 100 you were more likely to be pulled for metabolics than for lameness. That seems to be a fundamental difference between the distances. A 100 is not the same as 2 50's the same as a 50 is not 2 LD's. The stresses in a 100 are greater than those in a 50 and I think that is what is showing up. Truman Cindy Collins wrote: Truman: My thoughts are that more and more 100s are fast loops these -- "The opposite of a correct statement is a false statement. The opposite of a profound truth may well be another profound truth." Niels Bohr -- Nobel Laureate, Physics =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Ridecamp is a service of Endurance Net, http://www.endurance.net. Information, Policy, Disclaimer: http://www.endurance.net/Ridecamp Subscribe/Unsubscribe http://www.endurance.net/ridecamp/logon.asp Ride Long and Ride Safe!! =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
|