Re: [RC] [RC] Kids, ponies and distance riding... Get a grip people - Nancy MittsThe height requirement for amusement rides has to do with the fit of the seat & safety restraints, regardless of age. So, yes, a very short adult would not be allowed on either. I don't believe height is truly a safety issue when it comes to riding though. And, age has little to do with skill and ability, as we all know adults who aren't too safe either. So, we're back to the legal age & liability. If AERC is going to use legal risk as a rationale for setting a minimum age, then anything under 18 is risky. In some states that may even be 21. Any other minumum age is arbitrary. Unless, you subscribe to the notion that life is more valuable the younger you are, and then the age needs to be set at the loss value our insurance would cover. At what age does our "moral responsibility" to have as safe a ride as possible end, Joe? At what age does an accident just become an accident? Anybody who rides runs the risk of being hurt, whether 8 or 14 or 18 or 48. I do find it a bit odd that some are finding it so horrible that we allow young children to participate, even though they are required to have an adult sponsor. Yet, no one seems to have a problem with them being turned loose to ride alone at 14 with only 500 miles competition experience. These days it seems anybody can sue anybody at any time for any perceived injury, and there really isn't any way to prevent it. I don't see setting some arbitrary minimum age as any help at all. Nancy Mitts
|