PNER newsletter

[jlong@mti.net]

"Steph Teeter" <step@fsr.com> wrote:

>Joe - you've opened a can of worms, and DeWayne - you
>can't stop wiggling!
 
I believe the can was opened by the PNER newsletter articles.  I'm
just shining light on it.

>I would really prefer that this discussion not go any farther
>on Ridecamp. It will certainly get uglier, and I suspect
>that most (if not all) subscribers do not want to be
>subjected to it.

Did you believe that the PNER members wanted to be subjected to it?

>I ask that if you must continue this discussion that
>you do it outside of Ridecamp.

Please keep in mind that I do not have access to having a rebuttal
published in the PNER newsletter, plus the long publication schedule
of a newsletter prevents a timely reponse.  That is why I used this
forum to raise my objections.  I believe it to be a fully appropriate
place to do so.

However, Ridecamp is your list and I will honor your request if others
do, after this question:  why do you feel your article in the
newsletter was appropriate but my response in Ridecamp was not?

-- Joe Long


=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Ridecamp is a service of Endurance Net, http://www.endurance.net.    
Information, Policy, Disclaimer: http://www.endurance.net/RideCamp   
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=