>
>If I remember my Arabian/Bedouin horse lore correctly (I will have to dig 
>out the 19th century book I read it out of), the Bedouin opinion about 
>horse color was that while chestnuts had the most speed, bays had the 
>most endurance.  Grays and blacks were considered to be neither stayers 
>nor speedsters.
>
>Of course, the Bedouins had all kinds of other superstitions about white 
>and black markings, hair growth patterns, etc as indications of 
>performance ability, loyalty, and good or bad luck.  For instance, the 
>Bedouin considered a horse with no white on it to be bad luck.  And they 
>also had beliefs about what colors/coat patterns etc. should be crossed 
>with each other to produce ....  They also considered a chestnut with a 
>"flaxen mane and tail" to be an indication of impure breeding.
>
>I don't know whether these different traits were linked to the 
>color/coate patterns, etc. or whether since both color and these traits 
>are heritable, it is merely a case of what my statistics professor called 
>"block booking"  (e.g. just because tall people have bigger feet than 
>short people--in general--doesn't mean that big feet causes people to be 
>tall)  It is the difference between correlation and causation.  (The 
>technical term for Sandy's comment about the chicken and the egg thing).
>
>However, if you look at thoroughbreds, there does seem to be some 
>validity to the old bays are stayers and chestnut are fast (and grays are 
>neither).  Statistically speaking, there is a disproportionate number of 
>chestnuts who are winners and a disproportionate number of grays who are 
>losers.  This takes nothing away from Native Dancer and Spectacular Bid, 
>two absolutely fantastic grays.
>
>But it could explain why you don't see many gray thoroughbreds.
>
>It could also be because none of the main arab/barb stallions used in 
>founding the throughbred (the Darley Arabian, the Godolphin Barb--some 
>people call him the Godolphin Arabian--and the Byerly Turk--some people 
>suspect that this horse was actually an Akhal-Teke) were gray.  These are 
>not the only oriental horses that were used in founding the thoroughbred, 
>but they were the most influential (there is another one, which actually 
>had more influence than the Godolphin Arabian, but nobody's ever heard of 
>him--even I can't remember his name--but he wasn't gray either).
>
>It is possible that there are so many grays in endurance today, because 
>gray was a very fashionable color for arabs in the mid 80's--which would 
>make them just about the right age right now.  And the reason they are 
>becoming less prevelant is because gray is no longer fashionable--it went 
>out in the early 90's.
>
>The way I see it, there is little evidence (or too much conflicting 
>eveidence) to suggest that success in endurance is in any way a function 
>of color (i.e. all things being equal, one color is better than another), 
>so to answer the original question...
>
>...All other things being equal, pick the one that you think is the 
>prettiest color.  For me, that's the chestnut, and I already explained my 
>totally irrational prejudice about that.
>
>kat
>
>p.s.  It has been my experience, that rarely is it ever a case of all 
>other things being equal.  So if I were truly reasonable, I would ignore 
>color entirely.
>
>