Re: [RC] Research Committee News in EN - Elizabeth WalkerYes - I remember, but I don't want to start the whole discussion up again. :)I was just reporting on what was in the report. : > On Oct 22, 2009, at 1:32 PM, Diane Trefethen wrote: Elizabeth Walker wrote:Concern #1: gives the reasoning behind the 30 minute pulse-down proposal. Basically, 60 minutes is just too lenient, and serious problems resulting in fatalities are being missed.This solution presupposes that horses who die don't recover within 30 minutes. But we do not know that. There are no finish line pulse times in the Horse Fatality Reports. Heidi has suggested that horses are more likely to evince trouble after they have had some time to "let down" so of the horses who get completions, maybe it is the ones that *are* pulsed and examined within 30 minutes that are dying. If so, then for a horse not in any apparent trouble, it makes more sense to have a rule requiring it to wait at least 30 minutes before getting its completion exam than to have a rule requiring it to pulse within 30 minutes. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Ridecamp is a service of Endurance Net, http://www.endurance.net. Information, Policy, Disclaimer: http://www.endurance.net/Ridecamp Subscribe/Unsubscribe http://www.endurance.net/ridecamp/logon.asp Ride Long and Ride Safe!! =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
|