Home Current News News Archive Shop/Advertise Ridecamp Classified Events Learn/AERC
Endurance.Net Home Ridecamp Archives
ridecamp@endurance.net
[Archives Index]   [Date Index]   [Thread Index]   [Author Index]   [Subject Index]

Re: [RC] RO-L - Steph Teeter

I agree 100% !!

Steph

On Jan 16, 2008, at 2:41 AM, k s swigart wrote:
>>

However, as far as I am concerned distinguising among the reasons that
riders elect not to go on with their horses that the vets have
determined to be "fit to continue" horses is just damned silly, and the
AERC should just combine all of the "RO" designations into Withdrawn,
and if it is because the rider thinks that worrying about whether the
easyboot is going to adequately protect the horse's otherwise
unprotected foot will take the fun out of the ride is irrelevant.


kat
Orange County, Calif.
:)


=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=


Ridecamp is a service of Endurance Net, http://www.endurance.net.
Information, Policy, Disclaimer: http://www.endurance.net/Ridecamp
Subscribe/Unsubscribe http://www.endurance.net/ridecamp/logon.asp

Ride Long and Ride Safe!!

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=


Replies
[RC] RO-L, k s swigart