Re: [RC] [RC] RO-L vs LAME - Crysta TurnageI agree with the others that a L pull code was correct in this instance. Even though the rider turned around and "eliminated themselves from the competition" by going back to the start, IF a vet was not available, the rider *would* have had the option of then turning around and going back out on the trail to the next regulated checkpoint. They were not actually eliminated from the competition officially until the vet had evaluated their horse. As Valerie proved recently, it's possible to be "off course" for some time but still remain in the competition. =)
*IF* whenever the vet is able to look at the horse, whether that be upon return to the start, the next checkpoint, or not until 3+ hours later when a vet is back in camp again, then the pull should be determined from that evaluation. If the horse still presents as lame, then L. If the horse has been in camp for 3 hours and presents sound, then technically nothing would have prevented that rider from returning to the competition up until the time of the evaluation (notwithstanding their caring for the welfare of their horse), and a RO-L code would be appropriate. The rider could have turned around, come back to camp for 2 hours, realized the horse was sound, then gone back out and continued down the trail. I would assume at this point that as long as they met whatever cut-off times might be in place, and the horse continued to present sound, then nothing would prevent them from finishing the ride.
To me it's pretty clear, pull codes are based upon the veterinary judgement at the time of the evaluation. If the horse is deemed fit to continue by the vet, then the RO codes are allowable. But the vet's opinion has to come first/supersede that of the rider.
~ Crysta Turnage
On 1/15/08, John Teeter <johnt@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Jan 15, 2008, at 9:44 AM, Beth Walker wrote: -- ~ Crysta "Those of us who finish near the back, make the rest of you look good."
|