RE: [RC] What IS the proposal? - heidi
As I understood it, the original proposal that was thrown out for discussion was having the horse be deemed fit to continue (ie the entire vet check) within 30 minutes. The concept of having only the pulse requirement met within 30 minutes and still having an hour for a full exam was proposed as a variation--and IMO it is a sensible one.
I did interject several posts back that I knew of two horses that
were slow to reach pulse criteria at rides due to exhaustion that
died later in the season--to clarify, these were both horses that were
ridden hard and were repeatedly slow to recover at multiple rides, and
who died in the fall or early winter. But then perhaps death in
two such horses over the years does not count as "substantiation" for
my impression in your book??
Well, gee, kat, if you want to get technical, I personally am
"inconvenienced" by having to present my horse post-ride at all.
I would FAR rather just go back to my rig, untack and clean up my
horse, and kick back with a cold beverage and something to eat.
Would you feel better if I changed my verbiage to read that no one
would be presented with an undue hardship? Not having to concern
yourself about getting back for the check is kind of in the same league
as not having to concern yourself with watching for trail markings, and
then being "inconvenienced" when you have to get back on
course...
Heidi
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Ridecamp is a service of Endurance Net, http://www.endurance.net.
Information, Policy, Disclaimer: http://www.endurance.net/Ridecamp
Subscribe/Unsubscribe http://www.endurance.net/ridecamp/logon.asp
Ride Long and Ride Safe!!
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
|