RE: [RC] 30 Min Rule - heidiFirst off, adrenaline is not so much of an issue at the finish--it
is a HUGE issue at the first vet check. And guess what--it
increases heart rates. So no, "adrenaline" per se is not causing
the marginally injured horse to look less injured, when his heart rate
is down and he is munching hay. So that dog don't hunt.
Second, how did the horse with the "naturally longer recovery
curve" get through all the vet checks that required him to be down in
half an hour? He is still the same horse at the finish line, and
if he has been ridden within his capacity, his "recovery curve" should
be the same. In fact, if it isn't, it is a sign that he has been
overridden--all the more reason to be concerned if he takes over half
an hour to recover. You've just presented one of the arguments
FOR having a 30-minute cut-off post-ride, IMO.
Third, yes, there would be merit in requiring pulse recovery within
30 and the biomechanical exam later. But one of the arguments
consistently put forth has been not wanting to put an undue
burden on ride personnel and vets. Having to examine each horse
twice instead of once would be a staff burden--but at least that
suggestion has merit. Given a choice of one or the other, I would
still rather see the horse be required to pulse down quickly and take
the risk that there may be a biomechanical problem brewing that I might
miss. Metabolic failure can result in emergency and sometimes
acute death--biomechanical problems can often be sorted out hours later
or even in the next day or week without putting the horse in undue
jeopardy.
Fourth, CRI's on the non-recovering horse would be interesting,
certainly. But a horse with an 80/80 CRI is still in
trouble. Don't forget that absolute recovery and the CRI are both
valuable indicators.
Heidi
-------- Original Message --------
|