Home Current News News Archive Shop/Advertise Ridecamp Classified Events Learn/AERC
Endurance.Net Home Ridecamp Archives
ridecamp@endurance.net
[Archives Index]   [Date Index]   [Thread Index]   [Author Index]   [Subject Index]

Re: [RC] Defining Endurance-An explanation that works for both sides - Lynne Glazer

I haven't read all of this stuff because of being off shooting Tevis, but noticed it's taking up bandwidth for the zillionth time.? I wish, oh I wish we could just call the sport "Distance Riding" and endurance is a division within it.

I've always told people not in the sport that I'm a "distance rider" as I popped in and out of LD vs 50s vs multidays.? They all "got it".

Thanks, Kim for trying to bring clarity to the campfire

Lynne
http://www.photo.lynnesite.com/Tevis, only the new trail above RF up yet


On Aug 9, 2006, at 10:07 AM, KimFue@xxxxxxx wrote:

Here is what part of the problem is.? Endurance is a generic term outside of AERC.? Nobody would have a clue outside of AERC if you stated....I do Limited Distance.? Endurance riding to other equestrians and all outside of AERC is a long distance ride that recognizes placing that is based on speed/recovery.? That separates it from ride and tie and CTR and Orienteering which are all distance riding events with horses.

<snip>
Our problem is that we (and everyone else) uses the generic term "endurance" to distinguish this sport from other distance sports like CTR & RAT AND we use the term "endurance" to designate a level with the sport.? It is no wonder there is so much confusion.
?
Kim Fuess


Replies
[RC] Defining Endurance-An explanation that works for both sides, KimFue