[RC] Duty to Maintain Trails - k s swigartNancy Reeds said: I do need to state that without the liability immunity I would have no trails to ride on. No landowner in his right mind would ever dedicate a public trail across his land if he would be held liable for injuries that occurred on "his" trail. Since this statement is as true for public landowners (i.e. the State) as it is for private landowners, please, please, PLEASE let us not complain that the State has no duty to maintain trails so that they are safe. I can think of nothing that is more likely to close trails on public land for all use, than to suggest that the State be held liable for injuries that occur because trails were not "safely" maintained. kat Orange County, Calif. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Ridecamp is a service of Endurance Net, http://www.endurance.net. Information, Policy, Disclaimer: http://www.endurance.net/Ridecamp Subscribe/Unsubscribe http://www.endurance.net/ridecamp/logon.asp Ride Long and Ride Safe!! =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
|