![]() |
Re: [RC] Reply to Truman - Truman PrevattThere are several issues - you don't run any faster than needed to win. If the field is not running at an 8 hour pace - why should you take the additional risk of doing so. To some extent we don't know how good some of these older horses really were. At the '94 Carolina ride four riders unleased a race that left the mouth hanging open. The first four ran sub 8 hours with Cash winning in about 7:30 and change.The other issue is while these older horses could do it - can any horse do a steady diet of sub 8 hour 100's. It is clear with 20 mile intervals in thier training, carbo loading, etc., the UAE has been able to show horses can run sub 8 hour 100's when asked. But we already knew that - even without 20 mile itervals and carbo loading. With the right durgs a rider has shown that can be pushed down to 7 hours. However, I guess the real question is why our horses (US) aren't showing the capability of the past. Could it be we (as a group ) aren't paying enough attention to the base and the time to build it? I have no ideal but it sure seems to be (and I may be wrong about this) as a whole the top 100 mile horses say of 10 to 15 years ago were better than todays. Truman heidi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
-- “Many people consider the things government does for them to be social progress but they regard the things government does for others as socialism.” Earl Warren =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Ridecamp is a service of Endurance Net, http://www.endurance.net. Information, Policy, Disclaimer: http://www.endurance.net/Ridecamp Subscribe/Unsubscribe http://www.endurance.net/ridecamp/logon.asp Ride Long and Ride Safe!! =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
|