[RC] Dr Ribley and BC's for LD's - Diane TrefethenThere have been several comments about Dr Melissa Ribley and her position on awarding a BC for LD rides. They portray her position incorrectly."In the Sept EN Dr Melissa Ribley writes that she would prefer no placings or BC in the LD." "I've judged more LD BCs than I can shake a stick at, and other than Melissa and a few other vets in her region, I've never heard a vet complain about doing it..." "I thought I would respond to Melissa Ribley's letter to EN about not offering BC on LD's." Dr Ribley is NOT opposed to giving a Best Condition award at the LD rides. What Dr Ribley is opposed to, as am I and many others in the Endurance community, is having a Top Ten finish be THE #1 CRITERION for receiving a Best Condition award as well as the use of riding time, ie SPEED, as one of the criteria for this award. To get Dr Ribley, and other vets who are opposed to the current procedure, to support BC's for LD rides, all that needs happen is 1) make the award available to all participants in the LD ride, regardless of placing and 2) stop using the time portion of the BC form when judging Best Condition for an LD ride. These changes would allow the vets to choose the LD horse that truly IS in the best condition. When Limited Distance rides were first approved for sanctioning, the BOD was very clear that they did NOT want speed to be part of any awards that might be given.* Their concern then, and the concern today, was not that competent, knowledgeable riders might override their horses. It was that NOT so knowledgeable or competent riders, given the allure of a Top Ten or First Place award might race a horse not properly prepared for the task. Now we have exactly such an award. Although it has been labeled "BC", it still requires, ABOVE ALL ELSE, that a horse Top Ten. If you open the Best Condition award to all participants in an LD and eliminate factoring in riding time, all LD riders will benefit, except possibly those who should probably be riding the longer rides as they will will now have to compete with ALL the well-conditioned horses instead of just those who were raced to a Top Ten. *The following is from a post by Randy Eiland to the AERC Members Forum this last September: I have pasted below the actual verbiage from the Feb 26, 1984 AERC BOD Meeting where LD got its "birth" and approval from the BOD - note that nowhere in this Motion is there mention of "novice", "inexperienced" or any other description that would indicate the distance was related to inexperience, novice, uneducated, or other similar descriptions that would indicated the riders knew less than those who competed in 50 mile or longer rides.
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Ridecamp is a service of Endurance Net, http://www.endurance.net. Information, Policy, Disclaimer: http://www.endurance.net/Ridecamp Subscribe/Unsubscribe http://www.endurance.net/ridecamp/logon.asp Ride Long and Ride Safe!! =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
|