Endurance.Net Ridecamp Archives

At 04:57 PM 9/15/2005, Michael Maul wrote:
> The rest of the increase is necessary so that ride managers can
> still afford to put on rides ...
This is a very convoluted piece of psuedo logic. Sorry Mike, but it doesn't 
make any sense. 

again, w/o the benefit of real number:(

a: 3x increase in spending over 2+ years (from the sw directors post)
b: ??x increase in membership over that period
c: ??x increase in gross income over that period

I'm sure there would be d,e, ... data points which might be gleaned to step 
logically toward a conclusion which >might< be that recurring spending 
(insurance, salaries, technology, printing, etc) were allowed to increase 
faster than recurring revenue. 

but that aside, I think it to be totally false that a $5 increase in day member 
fees effects the ability of a ride manager to put on a rides.

jt.

(p.s. ?? re: , New_Aerc <AERCMembersForum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> - is there a fork of 
the members list under consideration?)
(ppss - cross posting is really not necessary with AERC issues is it?)




=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

Ridecamp is a service of Endurance Net, http://www.endurance.net.
Information, Policy, Disclaimer: http://www.endurance.net/Ridecamp
Subscribe/Unsubscribe http://www.endurance.net/ridecamp/logon.asp

Ride Long and Ride Safe!!

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=