Re: [RC] did AHA give in or did they have no choice - heidiAs far as the "giving in" part, I suspect (and this is only my assumption, that's all) that the new AHA president had something to do with it. He seems to want to resolve all this stuff (lawsuits) in order to stop draining the $$$ out of the registry.Minor clarification - to stop draining $$ out of AHA, which is responsible in part for many of the Registry's expenses post-merger, which is an entirely OTHER issue. As far as "caving" to save money, a law suit like this can literally put an organization like AHA out of business financially. I am not condoning the decision, I am just stating that it wasn't a matter of spending some money, it was a matter of AHA viability. There is some truth to this--but I would feel far more comfortable if they would SAY that they are doing it to stop draining money, instead of touting it as such a wonderful decision. We all understand about having to compromise sometimes due to financial drain--but that shouldn't mean that we compromise our principles. It bothers me to see the compromise promoted in terms of what a wonderful thing it is, instead of telling the truth that fighting it was breaking the organization and that it is accepted with chagrin. Heidi =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Ridecamp is a service of Endurance Net, http://www.endurance.net. Information, Policy, Disclaimer: http://www.endurance.net/Ridecamp Subscribe/Unsubscribe http://www.endurance.net/ridecamp/logon.asp Ride Long and Ride Safe!! =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
|