[RC] Doctrinaire bit nonsense and open minds - Ridecamp GuestPlease Reply to: Ray O'Donohue rno2m@xxxxxxxxxxxx or ridecamp@xxxxxxxxxxxxx ========================================== Let us in the future observe the "gimmicks" in the mouths of all David O'Connor's event horses.He and much of the USET have been involved with Parelli for years-and yet David still sometimes uses a "slider" gag bit,cleverly disguised as an "ordinary" snaffle.My own favorite new generation gag bit is not disguised as anything,,and does look like quite a lot of metal gadgetry,yet it has a three piece "loop" tongue relief mouthpiece which is less severe than what I think David's has.And neither bit is a "gimmick".Why not call a "regular snaffle" a gimmick? We all know what the nutcracker effect is. Must the horse be ridden with nothing at all on his head,to be "gimmick-free"? Must every new bit design in the future be called a gimmick because it it is not a simple snaffle? Must the amount of visible metal component be an indication of severity? Only if one is too lazy to think.Mr.Parelli could teach me a lot,no doubt.I have some of his books and videos,for I am open-minded to a fault.But simplistic assertions he has made regarding bits show us that he doesn't have all the answers.Nobody does. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Ridecamp is a service of Endurance Net, http://www.endurance.net. Information, Policy, Disclaimer: http://www.endurance.net/Ridecamp Subscribe/Unsubscribe http://www.endurance.net/ridecamp/logon.asp Ride Long and Ride Safe!! =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
|