Home Current News News Archive Shop/Advertise Ridecamp Classified Events Learn/AERC
Endurance.Net Home Ridecamp Archives
ridecamp@endurance.net
[Archives Index]   [Date Index]   [Thread Index]   [Author Index]   [Subject Index]

FW: [RC] IronMan GPS - Catfish Daniels

-----Original Message-----
From: Catfish Daniels [mailto:
CatfishDaniels@xxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent:
Monday, December 15, 2003 8:55 AM
To: 'Sundaez@xxxxxxx'
Subject: RE: [RC] IronMan GPS

 

Hi Mel,

Yea, I think you’re right about having to switch something in order to save some battery time.  With the receiver I also seem to have to replace the batteries frequently, but I’m pretty sure I get way more than 6 hrs out of it.  Thinking back, I can already think of at least 11 hrs of riding since replacing the batteries last.  My unit takes 3 AAA batteries, not AA.  Don’t know if that’s the difference or not.  Don’t know about you, but once I get all my stats on a new route, I usually don’t continue taking it with me unless I explore a new trail.  I seem to be more focused on my HRM when it comes to using something on a regular basis.

 

Catfish

 

 

 

-----Original Message-----
From: ridecamp-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:ridecamp-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Sundaez@xxxxxxx
Sent:
Monday, December 15, 2003 8:35 AM
To: kskf@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; ridecamp@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [RC] IronMan GPS

 

In a message dated 12/15/2003 7:01:20 AM Pacific Standard Time, kskf@xxxxxxxxxxxxx writes:

Which battery (if I get one I will go ahead and get a spare) - the watch battery or the GPS unit?

 

The Iron Man eats batteries IMO. I have to replace them every couple rides. It uses the 3  AA batteries. I had 6 hours on the last batteries I used before it flaked out near the end of a training ride. ANyone else have this problem? Does keeping in "monitor" mode eat more battery power than if you keep it on the Odometer?

 

Mel