Home Current News News Archive Shop/Advertise Ridecamp Classified Events Learn/AERC
Endurance.Net Home Ridecamp Archives
ridecamp@endurance.net
[Archives Index]   [Date Index]   [Thread Index]   [Author Index]   [Subject Index]

RE: [RC] [AERC-Members] HRM at Vet Check Poll - Bob Morris

Bobbie:
 
So in fact you would have two rides being held concurrently over the same course and under the same rules except for pulse recovery time. This give thought to a few questions; if there are fewer than 10 riders declaring for the "race" category, what happens to the points? If you declare for the "complete" category and find that you are in the top runners can you "upgrade" top the "race" category?
 
Bob
 

Bob Morris
Morris Endurance Enterprises
Boise, ID

-----Original Message-----
From: ridecamp-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:ridecamp-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Roberta Jo Lieberman
Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2003 1:02 PM
To: Truman Prevatt
Cc: AERC; enduranceriders; DR@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Ride Camp
Subject: Re: [RC] [AERC-Members] HRM at Vet Check Poll

Hi all,
Don't know if this has already been suggested, but Matthew called yesterday with an idea for streamlining the VC process and addressing the concern about racers meeting the 15-minute window due to logistics. It is basically having two pulse boxes -- one with a big sign "RACE" and the other with a big sign "COMPLETE"  (or whatever language we choose). Those competing for a placing will have no more traffic --- and probably a lot less -- than they would currently, with everyone, regardless of intention, jostling for position in the pulse line. Those in the completion queue would go about their business at their chosen, non-frantic pace.

Now here's a new wrinkle:  If a "race for place" participant arrives at the vet check and realizes "I ain't gonna make the 15-minute recovery window," that individual can simply switch to the other line on his or her own before presenting --- sort of an "RO-completion". It again shifts the possibility for making a smart choice to the rider. If they are on the borderline (or for whatever reason), they can seamlessly make a choice for safety and sanity.

With the twin-box system, pulse-checkers can move from one side to the other as the number of entries in each waxes and wanes---potentially a very efficient use of volunteers.

Bobbie

Truman Prevatt wrote:

Below are the results of the use of HRM at vet check polls.
 

Have you ridden at a ride where a hand held HRM was used in the pulse box?

Yes (72 votes)80.00%
No (18 votes)20.00%
(Total Votes: 90 )
 

If your answer is yes to the above do you feel it is a valid way to determine if a horse is within parameters?

Yes (77 votes)86.52%
No (12 votes)13.48%
(Total Votes: 89 )

I know the numbers don't quite add up - guess some people don't read instructions, don't follow directions or get eaisly confused ;-).

Truman


Replies
Re: [RC] [AERC-Members] HRM at Vet Check Poll, Roberta Jo Lieberman