Re: [RC] [AERC-Members] HRM at Vet Check Poll - Roberta Jo Lieberman
Hi all,
Don't know if this has already been suggested, but Matthew called yesterday
with an idea for streamlining the VC process and addressing the concern
about racers meeting the 15-minute window due to logistics. It is basically
having two pulse boxes -- one with a big sign "RACE" and the other with
a big sign "COMPLETE" (or whatever language we choose). Those competing
for a placing will have no more traffic --- and probably a lot less --
than they would currently, with everyone, regardless of intention, jostling
for position in the pulse line. Those in the completion queue would go
about their business at their chosen, non-frantic pace.
Now here's a new wrinkle: If a "race for place" participant arrives
at the vet check and realizes "I ain't gonna make the 15-minute recovery
window," that individual can simply switch to the other line on his or
her own before presenting --- sort of an "RO-completion". It again shifts
the possibility for making a smart choice to the rider. If they are on
the borderline (or for whatever reason), they can seamlessly make a choice
for safety and sanity.
With the twin-box system, pulse-checkers can move from one side to the
other as the number of entries in each waxes and wanes---potentially a
very efficient use of volunteers.
Bobbie
Truman Prevatt wrote:
Below are the results of the use of HRM at vet check
polls.
Have you ridden at a ride where a hand held HRM was
used in the pulse box?
Yes (72 votes)80.00% No (18 votes)20.00% (Total Votes: 90 )
If your answer is yes to the above do you feel it is
a valid way to determine if a horse is within parameters?
Yes (77 votes)86.52% No (12 votes)13.48% (Total Votes: 89 )
I know the numbers don't quite add up - guess some
people don't read instructions, don't follow directions or get eaisly confused
;-).
Truman
Title: 404 Not Found
Not Found
The requested URL /cgi-local/survey/bar.gif was not found on this server.