Home Current News News Archive Shop/Advertise Ridecamp Classified Events Learn/AERC
Endurance.Net Home Ridecamp Archives
ridecamp@endurance.net
[Archives Index]   [Date Index]   [Thread Index]   [Author Index]   [Subject Index]

Re: [RC] RO pulls poll - Barbara McCrary

You're absolutely correct.  The code should have been RO-L.
 
Barbara
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2003 2:13 PM
Subject: Re: [RC] RO pulls poll

The way I understand the pull codes that should have been an ROL - at least to day what it should have been. You pull was your option but the reason you pulled wasn't you were overheated, didn't feet too well, etc. it was because you though your horse was off.

Truman

rides2far@xxxxxxxx wrote:
    True Confession: How many people have had an RO pull that really 
was
    because of lameness or methabolic/recovery problems?
    

Confession? Heck, what's to confess? I felt my horse was off. It *was*
lameness. The vet didn't see anything. He said he was fit to continue. I
said I would pull he was off on the trail. The pull showed up as RO.
What's to confess...that I'm more conservative than the pull criteria?

Angie

________________________________________________________________
The best thing to hit the internet in years - Juno SpeedBand!
Surf the web up to FIVE TIMES FASTER!
Only $14.95/ month - visit www.juno.com to sign up today!

  

Replies
[RC] RO pulls poll, rides2far
Re: [RC] RO pulls poll, Truman Prevatt