![]() |
[RC] Making the mistake of "racing" (was: Michel/Monsieur Joseph) - k s swigartGary Daniels said: That's not what my post was all about. I'm simply proud of Michel's accomplishment at the recent NC, and that's all. I think with Heather winning BC at Tevis, it's clear that hear horse had more left, and it is equally as gracious on Heather's part to have ridden WITH Michel, rather than racing him for most of the day. They both arrived at the finish together after being GREAT sportsmen to one another and to their horses. For everybody who seems to have the idea that what Heather and Michel did was to "fix" the race by being gracious and sportsman-like. I would like to point out that it isn't just about graciousness and sportsmanship. It is also about being smart. Quite frankly, one does not win Tevis by changing your focus from properly negotiating the entire trail to competing head to head with another horse that happens to be near you on the course. Doing so comes under the heading of breaking MY cardinal rule of "I need to remember to ride my horse, not the place I am in." Had Heather and Michel been foolish enough to make the mistake of "racing each other all day" it is entirely possible that neither of them would have even finished the course. And Heather did not have to give up anything by being "gracious" and waiting for Michel when leaving the last vet check. If she had enough horse to win the ride by riding ahead of him, she had enough horse to win the ride by riding with him; and if she didn't have enough horse to win by riding with him, she probably didn't have enough horse to win by riding ahead of him either. I point this out not to suggest that the players here were not gracious and did not have good sportsmanship, but rather to demonstrate that one does not have to sacrifice graciousness and good sportsmanship in order to race, but rather remembering it and exercising it throughout the entire effort is more likely to get you to the finish line first. Had Heather and Michel not recognized much earlier in the day that it was in both of their (and their horses) best interests not to engage in a one on one dual with each other the outcome might very well have been quite different (e.g. with neither of them finishing at all, or with over using their horses earlier on and being overtaken by somebody who hadn't made that mistake). After spending hours going along a 100 mile trail, the people who are actually ON the horses, if they are astute enough horsemen, rarely ever NEED to engage in a one on one dual to figure out who has more horse at the end; and doing so is fraught with risk...and just plain dumb. kat Orange County, Calif. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Ridecamp is a service of Endurance Net, http://www.endurance.net. Information, Policy, Disclaimer: http://www.endurance.net/Ridecamp Subscribe/Unsubscribe http://www.endurance.net/ridecamp/logon.asp Ride Long and Ride Safe!! =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
|