Re: [RC] [AERC-Members] Protecting.... - terreThen shortly after he has completed his horse, Smitley, starts to feel bad I had thought of this--you are absolutely correct. However--"shortly"--how shortly? If the horse passes all completion criteria, and 'later' started to 'feel bad', the ride vet would have to authority to decided that that horse did not "require" treatment, just that it would be a good idea to "prevent" further deterioration. Also to define "serious" in this context--treated early, it might be simply some banamine. I DO share your concern. I suppose the question is: overall, which will be more prevalent--riders who refuse treatment rather than lose points, or riders who override because there are no consequences (to themselves)? If the vet feels that a horse "requires" treatment, the result is the same whether it is treated or not (6.2.1.7--"any equine that a ride veterinarian advises should be treated for a metabolic or soundness problem, but treatment is refused by the rider or owner, shall be considered in the same light as a treated horse...") If not "angie's rule", how DO we handle riders that chronically ride their horses over the edge? You and I have been around long enough to have seen them--if they can't win a given ride, they don't care if they complete. Losing points for the whole season might get their attention--little else seems to. Maybe extremely high vet bills? But if they are prepared to replace the horse.... I dunno. I DO see that problem... terre (oh, for a perfect world......) =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Ridecamp is a service of Endurance Net, http://www.endurance.net. Information, Policy, Disclaimer: http://www.endurance.net/Ridecamp Subscribe/Unsubscribe http://www.endurance.net/ridecamp/logon.asp Ride Long and Ride Safe!! =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
|