Re: [RC] Re:IV as ride after care not as (needed treatment) - C. EylerSince the use of an IV carries the small but real risk of permanent damage to the blood vessel, it seems like this kind of treatment should be reserved for when the horse needs it and not just so that it can be ridden hard again a week or two sooner. Cindy ----- Original Message ----- Perhaps the replacement of fluids after a ride is finished is also an after care option which I should keep my nose out of. I know that the quicker the calories, fluids, electrolytes, and anything else lost (used) on a ride are replaced to the horses system, why the better for the horse. The process can probably be done with a month at pasture, but what is wrong with a rider working on that process at a quicker rate? What is wrong with a rider wanting to take out a horse on another ride sooner than a month? Just perhaps the rider does know what they are doing, and can get a horse ready for more competition sooner. Good for them! That is how we learn more things about what works. Individuals discover it, and then the knowledge gets shared. Let us leave open the options for individual decisions on feeding and treating horses. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Ridecamp is a service of Endurance Net, http://www.endurance.net. Information, Policy, Disclaimer: http://www.endurance.net/Ridecamp Subscribe/Unsubscribe http://www.endurance.net/ridecamp/logon.asp Ride Long and Ride Safe!! =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
|