If a rider had a horse die, and the necropsy
results were made public, say in EN, would you object to reading those results
and learning from them?
Can you honestly say that you would turn the
page and not read it?
I have sat in on a dozen or more Human
Autopsies, and I have also donated one of my llamas that died to my Vet that
just hired two Vet graduates from the University in Colorado, Susan
G's Alma Mater... for a necropsy. I was allowed to watch the necropsy as well,
and the information I got from all of them, human or otherwise was
invaluable.
To do these things is like research, if we
don't have research, we would still be dying off at age
35.
The soul has left the body, the body is a
shell, I never can understand why there should be any religious objections, when
religion certainly believes in the soul.
Perhaps if you had this information, you would
never be at risk to even think of infringing on your
beliefs.
>>Listen up folks......if that is all
it costs in California, where Vet care is on the norm much more expensive than
other States, I see no reason not to make it mandatory.
I have reilgous problems with Autopsies and
necropsies, would there be a religous exemption? It seems *very* unfair to
force me to put my horse through that should she die at a ride. It should be
the rider/owner's option, not a mandatory rule that it be preformed.
Steph
--- Outgoing mail is certified Virus
Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.510
/ Virus Database: 307 - Release Date:
8/14/2003
