Re: [RC] Refusing entry to rides [was How Sad] - Truman Prevatt
I would say unless there was documented proof of abuse caused the
problem you'd have a hard time withstanding a protest. Lots of things
can happen between the time a rider leaves the ride and they get home.
The rules are pretty specific that "you cannot deny entry except for
cause," and the way I read that the cause better be pretty good.
Lif Strand wrote:
Quoted from Truman Prevatt's message:
If a rider chose to not treat a marginal horse ( that could benefit
from treatment ) because he would not be able to enter the next year
this would be an unintended consequence and not a good one IMO.
Sorry - I didn't word my question well. What I meant was if I, as a
RM, found out that a horse needed treatment after it got home due to
some condition that arose from the ride (the issue aside of how I
might have found this out) could I then not accept an entry the next
year?
Lif Strand
Quemado NM USA
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Ridecamp is a service of Endurance Net, http://www.endurance.net.
Information, Policy, Disclaimer: http://www.endurance.net/Ridecamp
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
- Replies
-
- Re: [RC] How Sad, Lif Strand
- Re: [RC] How Sad, Lynne Glazer
- Re: [RC] How Sad, Trailrite
- [RC] Refusing entry to rides [was How Sad], Lif Strand
- Re: [RC] Refusing entry to rides [was How Sad], Lif Strand
|
|