Re: RC: Re: Re: Re: Charges only pertain to AERC members

["Nancy Mitts" <mitts_n@hotmail.com>]

And the funny thing is not more than a month ago some ride managers were 
complaining that it was just too hard to figure out who was already a 
member. There were quite a few posts on this list advocating dropping the 
$10 day membership requirement. My how quick the worm turns.
Nancy Mitts
AERC # 8558


>From: "Barbara McCrary" <bigcreekranch@cruzio.com>
>To: "Howard Bramhall" <hwb67@msn.com>
>CC: "RIDECAMP" <ridecamp@endurance.net>
>Subject: RC:  Re: Re:  Re: Charges only pertain to AERC members
>Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2001 07:22:50 -0700
>
>That's exactly what the $10 fee does......allows a non-member to be an AERC 
>member for the duration of that weekend.
>
>Barbara McCrary
>West region director
>Chair, Rules Committee
>
>
>
>-----Original Message -----
>   From: Howard Bramhall
>   To: ridecamp@endurance.net
>   Sent: Thursday, August 02, 2001 5:35 AM
>   Subject: RC: Re: Re: Charges only pertain to AERC members
>
>
>
>
>     Why not require that anyone doing a ride of 50 miles or greater be a 
>member
>     of AERC?  That would at least give us some leverage.
>
>     Cindy
>
>
>     I think another option would be that the ten dollars you pay at a ride 
>for not being a member of AERC actually makes you a member for that ride 
>week-end.  You sign a legal paper stating such at the ride.  That way you 
>are subject to the rules and penalties of AERC. And your ten dollars goes 
>to the full year fee if you want to join permanently.
>
>     Sounds too easy, and probably won't turn out to be so, when the 
>lawyers get hold of it.  Reality always seems to make things more difficult 
>than it should be.
>
>     cya,
>     Howard


_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp