[WARNING: CONTROVERSY
ALERT]
There are always people who will object to things that other
people think are reasonable. People object to people who have other
religious beliefs don't they? Or to people having the right to decide
what's right for their own bodies. There's even people who object to
anyone "using" animals for any reason whatsoever - whether or not pain
(cruelty) is involved. Who will define what is right and wrong for
all? Perhaps the director of this movie is doing the cruelty to animals
people a favor - if people don't know and can't find out that sick practices
exist, then how will anyone stop them?
I'm thinking that by
complaining to Amazon.com we're shooting at the messenger, not the creator of
the message. INFORMATION should never be censored. IDEAS should
never be censored. Practices... now that's something else. But go
to the ones who are performing the practice - in this case people who
allegedly tortured the animals - not the ones who disseminate the
information. If you don't like the movie (the book, the article, the
email) then don't look at it - that's your right. You can even give the
movie we're talking about a bad review. But don't ask anyone else to
censor anything so you don't have to look at it. Be proactive, not
reactive. Lif
______________________________________________________
Lif
& Paul Strand STRAND
ENTERPRISES fasterhorses.com
providing you with alternatives for your
life
Web Page Design * Computer
Graphics * Internet Research * Fine Art
Blue-Green Algae & other
complementary health options
Arabian Horses for Distance Riding
fax: (561)
594-4609