archives
07/2006 - 08/200608/2006 - 09/2006
09/2006 - 10/2006
10/2006 - 11/2006
11/2006 - 12/2006
12/2006 - 01/2007
01/2007 - 02/2007
02/2007 - 03/2007
03/2007 - 04/2007
04/2007 - 05/2007
05/2007 - 06/2007
06/2007 - 07/2007
07/2007 - 08/2007
08/2007 - 09/2007
09/2007 - 10/2007
10/2007 - 11/2007
11/2007 - 12/2007
12/2007 - 01/2008
01/2008 - 02/2008
02/2008 - 03/2008
03/2008 - 04/2008
04/2008 - 05/2008
05/2008 - 06/2008
06/2008 - 07/2008
Straight Talk About Strangles
Add Your CommentsEquisearch.com - Full Story
Debunk the four biggest myths about the highly contagious disease strangles.
By Eliza R.L. McGraw
Maybe it's the name that amplifies the dread horsepeople tend to feel when the grapevine rumors a neighborhood infection. Certainly, no one who's had to nurse a horse through to recovery wants a repeat experience, and anyone who's read John Steinbeck's The Red Pony about a young boy's first exposure to death and loss can't help but expect the worst of the disease. Yes, strangles has a terrible name and a worse reputation. Horses who come down with a Streptococcus equi infection get an ugly kind of sick, and they seem to be knocked out of training forever.
"People have definitely gotten more panicked about strangles over the years," says George Sengstack, manager of Callithea Farm, a 60-horse boarding stable in Potomac, Maryland. "Fourteen years ago, before we had horses trailering in and out, I had a horse who got strangles. We kept him away from the other horses in a round pen and were really careful [about using separate equipment]. He got better, and it wasn't a big ordeal."
More...
