archives
07/2006 - 08/200608/2006 - 09/2006
09/2006 - 10/2006
10/2006 - 11/2006
11/2006 - 12/2006
12/2006 - 01/2007
01/2007 - 02/2007
02/2007 - 03/2007
03/2007 - 04/2007
04/2007 - 05/2007
05/2007 - 06/2007
06/2007 - 07/2007
07/2007 - 08/2007
08/2007 - 09/2007
09/2007 - 10/2007
10/2007 - 11/2007
11/2007 - 12/2007
12/2007 - 01/2008
01/2008 - 02/2008
02/2008 - 03/2008
03/2008 - 04/2008
04/2008 - 05/2008
05/2008 - 06/2008
06/2008 - 07/2008
Bare VS Shod: There must be a compromise - Tom Sites
Add Your CommentsFirst off let me start by saying i'm not leaning towards any position, yet see the best both have to offer, hense the compromise.
i had a shoe farrier trim Gabriels feet for over a year and it always seemed to me he had too long a toe. With 2 trims by a 'barefoot' trimmer his foot is the shape i always thought it to be. But she said it'll take a few more trimmings and growth to get it where we want to be. I am considering a number of hoof protection boots and i again admit, i'll lean to what seems easier to me to fit and works best for the horse. Any suggetions would be appreciated. And if it works here in the mountains it'll work anywhere, except we don't have too much swamp but there are a few bogs in the wet season.
Why do farriers leave such a long toe? Does that not put stress on the tendons? I *think* farriers compensate the usage of shoes to cover up inadequate trims. Correct me on your perfect farriers, but they won't come and see me and as i look back all my horses had too long a toe. I must admit Jody had a good trimmed foot on all her horses w/ shoes
Perhaps i may be wrong (again) but this lesson late in life will perhaps change me or take me back to where i was w/ long toes and steel shoes. But if i see i ever again go to shoes, i'll keep this barefoot trim program going, hense the compromise.
ts
Comments
Post a Comment<< Home