|
    Check it Out!    
|
|
RideCamp@endurance.net
Re: RC: LD definition
On Mon, 27 Sep 1999 18:16:20 -0500, "Becky Huffman" <TOS@htcomp.net>
wrote:
>I didn't understand that the rules changes would be temporary. The 0-49
>was voted in. Issues were addressed, workable solutions were found and
>implemented. Then, after the fact, the petition was circulated, forcing
>another vote, which is the one coming up.
0 - 49 was voted in without sufficient discussion and consideration of
the consquences, and was a classic case of "fixing something that
wasn't broke" and ending up with unintended consequences. I do not
agree that the temporary solutions are workable; they are at best
workarounds, kludges. Plans for the petition began immediately upon
release of the vote count on the change.
IMO the whole thing was a mistake and a boondoggle from the beginning.
--
Joe Long
jlong@mti.net
http://www.mti.net Business
http://www.rnbw.com Personal
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Ridecamp is a service of Endurance Net, http://www.endurance.net.
Information, Policy, Disclaimer: http://www.endurance.net/RideCamp
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
|
    Check it Out!    
|
|
Home
Events
Groups
Rider Directory
Market
RideCamp
Stuff
Back to TOC