Fwd: Firemountain 50 -2nd that!!

[SandyDSA@aol.com]

In a message dated 1/15/99 8:35:59 AM Pacific Standard Time,
BMcCrary27@aol.com writes:

<< FIRST consideration MUST be given to
  Championship riders. >> >>

I don't know if FIST consideration should be given but certainly well-defined
consideration, as in a determined NUMBEr of entries for EACH distance, with
certainly a greater number of slots given to the 50s but it would be unfair to
sit the LD iders on a waiting list until they determine whether or not there
is space for them. That would be patently unfair, and certainly a huge problem
for riders who may in a year or two be wanting to ride the 50 miler there.
Let's just not make this a situation of 50 milers first and only. Simply
making the parameters of the Championship rides clear would help considerably
methinks!
san

---- Begin included message ----

• To: Teddy@runningbear.com
• Subject: Re: Firemountain 50 -2nd that!!
• From: BMcCrary27@aol.com
• Date: Fri, 15 Jan 1999 11:33:45 EST
• Cc: ridecamp@endurance.net
• Resent-Date: Fri, 15 Jan 1999 08:35:14 -0800 (PST)
• Resent-From: ridecamp@endurance.net
• Resent-Message-ID: <"VsG2j3.0.DG1.Uusds"@starfish>
• Resent-Sender: ridecamp-request@endurance.net

In a message dated 1/15/99 6:26:04 AM Pacific Standard Time,
Teddy@runningbear.com writes:

<< Now there is the LD issue.  IMO, a championship ride has NO PLACE for an LD
 division (unless there is room).  FIRST consideration MUST be given to
 Championship riders. >>

I must agree with this statement.  Especially the last sentence.

BMc

---- End included message ----