Check it Out!     |
[Date Prev] | [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] |
[Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Author Index] | [Subject Index] |
Actually the published data would indicate very strongly that this ratio is also not a good indicator except under certain specific circumstances, not across the board. The only weight parameter that statistically (I know, statistics is a dirty word) indicated anything was the body weight of the horse itself, in that as bodyweight increased, the incidence of lameness increases. And even then, there were certain circumstances when rider weight contributed to that and others when it didn't. So it would be pretty hard to come up with a workable formula/protocol that fairly judged competitors that took weight into consideration. Where is this published information? It would be interesting to research this. I know that there is more involved than just the weight of the rider and horse. I would like to look into this further. Since there is no perfect way to do this YET then would it not make sense to not have the weight issue at all. And judge on which horse is in the best condition. Kelly =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Ridecamp is a service of Endurance Net, http://www.endurance.net. Information, Policy, Disclaimer: http://www.endurance.net/RideCamp =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
    Check it Out!     |