[RC] Thoughts on proposed treament insurance - Lynn WhiteI have a fundamental issue with the proposed added fee for “emergency treatment” insurance. This sounds like a good idea on the surface, but has anyone considered the thought that having this fund might actually result in riders putting their horses at greater risk? I would wager that we’d see a select group of riders continually dipping into this fund. I do not wish to subsidize the attitude of “I can ride like hell because there is a fund to help me pay for a vet to treat my sick horse.” I don’t like to see horses suffer, but harm usually comes dressed as good intentions. My philosophy on endurance riding and horse ownership goes like this: If you can’t afford or don’t want to pay for a vet to treat your horses, either ride in a less risky manner or find another horse sport. If you don’t have a rainy day fund in a savings account set aside for an equine emergency you should not have a horse. If we try to idiot proof our sport we’ll just end up with a sport full of idiots. Lynn =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Ridecamp is a service of Endurance Net, http://www.endurance.net. Information, Policy, Disclaimer: http://www.endurance.net/Ridecamp Subscribe/Unsubscribe http://www.endurance.net/ridecamp/logon.asp Ride Long and Ride Safe!! =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
|