Endurance.Net Ridecamp Archives

On Feb 29, 2008, at 12:57 AM, <Leonard.Liesens@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

160km in 5 stages

not so bad. The recent one's we saw in the UAE were basically 35,35,25,25,25,15

Las Cruces was, on the other hand,?

It sounds like 35,35,35,35,20 is basically what is being proposed.?

no drastic changes
metabolic parameters revisited

This should be good. FEI is already much more attuned to vet parameters than, for example, AERC.?

dedicated trotting lane for horses needing a re-trotting

This also is a good thing for large rides where flow is important.

very few answers from riders to the FEI questionnaire

Leo, do you have a pointer to the?questionnaire? ?Wait -- here it is:

http://www.endurance.net/channels/2006/12/fei-endurance-questionnaire-2006.html

http://www.endurance.net/internatinal/2006FEIQuestionnaire.pdf

that's what we can expect from the revolution

How sure are you of the breadth of what has been presented? Are you most certain that there are no other components to the proposals?

anyway, it is very sad that no riders were making part of the task force, only vets, officials and chefs d'equipe

It is too bad no riders were part of the task force. That perspective would have been most valuable. It sounds as if the?questionnaire?wasn't much used.

jt

Video: http://www.malaysia-wec.com/sc_video.html