[RC] SVO (was: warnings etc.) - k s swigartTruman said: The warning was not ambiguous. It's very difficult to have a sentence that short with an adjective, subject and verb be ambiguous - especially if the subject and verb are very specific. Actually, since "bite" is a transitive verb (one that allows an object and requires an object in order to be fully understood), the fact that the sentence did NOT include an object (that is what the "O" in SVO of the subject line stands for), it was very ambiguous. Unless you include an object for the verb "to bite," the statement "my horse bites" is virtually meaningless. ALL horses bite; at least all horses with teeth do, which is virtually all horses. They don't all bite the same things, but they all bite. You want people to know that your horse bites people, you need to tell them that your horse bites people; otherwise, they may make assumptions about the object of the verb to bite...and be wrong. Any sentence with a transitive verb requires a subject, a verb, and an object in order not to be ambiguous. And this is grade school grammar, so even people who claim never to have made it past fourth grade should know that. kat Orange County, Calif. :) kat Orange County, Calif. :) =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Ridecamp is a service of Endurance Net, http://www.endurance.net. Information, Policy, Disclaimer: http://www.endurance.net/Ridecamp Subscribe/Unsubscribe http://www.endurance.net/ridecamp/logon.asp Ride Long and Ride Safe!! =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
|