[RC] Why I require hoof protection - k s swigartRick Jackson said: My concern is that Kat said that "she doesn't trust any rider or vet to pull a footsore horse". I would and do trust the vets to know what they are doing and be able to stand up to the arguementative riders. That is what they are paid to do. Not in my experience. I have been to more than one endurance ride where the vets are muttering among themselves about how foot sore some barefoot horse is, will perhaps try to mention to the riders that this is what they are seeing only to have it fall on deaf ears as the rider insists that it isn't so, and so shrug their shoulders, let the horse go on, and go back to muttering among themselves. Most riders will know if their horse is off even if it is on all four. Not in my experience. I have been to more than one endurance ride where there is a rider of a horse that is sore on all four and is completely unaware of it, and will even remain completely unaware of it when it is pointed out to them in as polite a way as possible by ride veterinarians and will instead come back with the rationalization that whoever is pointing it out to them is just prejudiced against barefoot horses. The PS region where she has her rides are some of the best terrain for a well conditioned barefoot horse. Not in my experience. In my experience (which is extensive, see below), the footing and the terrain in the PS is some of the most harsh and unforgiving (read: hard and abrasive) to the unprotected hoof. There are some horses that can do fine (even fine at endurance distances) barefoot in sugary sand, moist turf, or foresty loam that come to the pacific southwest with its decomposed granite and not so decomposed granite, sandstone, and clay that has been baked as hard as a rock which wears the foot off of a pasture ornament in less than a week and caouldn't go a mile undersaddle without gimping around. And here is my extensive experience: _I_ (even before it was vogue and had achieved its religious fervor) did multiple limited distance rides and 50 mile endurance rides with my barefoot horse (as in, bare, bare foot, not booted, etc). My first two years of AERC rides were done on a horse that didn't wear shoes. I DID put shoes on my horse for his first 50, but he had thrown three of the four shoes by the end of the ride, but still completed just fine, so I didn't bother shoing him for his next efforts. At the 1992 Camp Pendleton Challenge I even has to request special permission in advance from the ride manager (who said it was fine with him as along as it was okay with the head vet) and the head vet (who said he wanted to do the pre-ride check himself) to start the ride with no shoes on my horse. The head vet said that it was okay with him but "I guarantee you won't finish the ride." He was wrong; I finished the ride in the top ten and got the high vet score in the BC evaluation. Though we both commented that "he has a lot less foot than he did at the start." The next month, I started (and didn't finish) the 20 MT 100 with this same barefoot horse. We didn't finish because _I_ pulled my horse about 60 miles into the ride because he was so footsore I felt guilty about asking him to go on, so I got off and led him the 5+ miles back to camp. He was a bit foot sore at the 55 mile vet check (in fact, I knew he was a bit foot sore before the 55 mile vet check and I had gotten off to lead him through the really stony bits because of it), but the vet (same as the head vet for Camp Pendleton mind you) didn't pull him for being foot sore despite the fact that I TOLD him, "He's a bit foot sore." Probably because he didn't look all that sore being trotted out in hand. At that time he was only sufficiently foot sore to wince occasionally when he stepped wrong on a rock while being ridden. This is a vet for whom I have a great deal of respect and is also a well respected endurance vet world-wide. He didn't pull my horse for being foot sore, and I didn't either, until I rode the horse another 5+ miles, and it took me a long time of arguing with myself to convince myself that I had to stop, get off, and go back even though the horse wasn't always foot sore but only in the bad footing. I suspect that the reason he was able to do 50 miles at Camp Pendleton with no shoes without a single misstep but was unable to do 55 miles at 20 Mule Team without getting "ouchie" (for which we were NOT pulled) was two-fold: 1) The footing at Camp Pendleton was clay and riding on the beach sand, while the footing at 20 Mule Team was sandstone, gravel, and just plain stony, and 2) he still had "a lot less foot" at the start of 20 Mule Team than he did at the start of Camp Pendleton...from having worn off so much foot doing 50 miles at Camp Pendleton. _I_ am one of the FIRST people who will try to work a horse barefoot for as long as possible, AND I have done endurance successfully with a completely barefoot horse. But I have also seen multitudes of barefoot horses gimping around on the predominantly DG trails of Southern California with owners who are blithely unaware (not uncaring but uaware) that their horse has sore feet. At a guess, I would be willing to say that only 1 in 10 of the barefoot horses I see being ridden out on the trails around here (not even endurance horses) doesn't have sore feet. It is excruciating for me to watch, and it is virtually impossible to convince the owners of these horses that this is the case (which I only will try to do if I am asked). However, it isn't only trail conditions that dictates whether a horse can successfully go barefoot, it is also living conditions. When my endurance horse was living in a 12'x24' stall with shavings for bedding, he could do 50 mile endurance rides every month or so (and the conditioning in between). After I moved him into a 40' x 140' paddock with prodominantly DG footing where he could run around and self exercise, I could no longer even condition him without some form of hoof protection. None of the horses that were out to pasture on 100 acres of DG could be ridden barefoot, and half of them couldn't even stay pasture sound without being ridden on this type of footing....even those that had been born and raised on it and never worn a shoe in their lives. There are some types of footing that simply cannot be adapted to. And there is a lot of this type of footing in Southern California. I have done a lot of rides in So Cal (not all of them), and the only ones that I have done that I would say have sufficiently forgiving footing that they aren't overly abrasive to the bare foot were Camp Pendleton, Bear Valley Springs (the trails there are virtually rock free with really nice footing), and the half of Warner Springs that is in/around the meadows (but get up onto the PCT and the story is different). I have never done the Bonita Turkey Trot, but I have ridden in/around Bonita, so I am willing to believe that it also may have fairly forgiving footing. PS rides that don't have forgiving footing include all the desert rides (including the Ridgecrest area, the Eastern Mojave, the Anza Borego area and pretty much all the southern Nevada rides), all of the San Gabriel Mountain rides, all of the PCT (and the rides which negotiate it), and Malibu. Tejon is kinda in the middle, and I haven't done Lake Los Angeles, so I don't know. Some of the rides that _I_ successfully negotiated with a barefoot horse were those that don't have particularly forgiving footing, so I know it can be done. But it doesn't change the fact that I also know that there are a goodly number of riders (not all) and vets (not all) who cannot tell when a horse is footsore....and yes, I want to save these horses from the ignorance of their riders those vets, especially since I really don't believe that ANY horse could negotiate 100 miles of such unforgiving footing without some form of hoof protection. And the reason I don't believe it is that I have tried it, with a horse that had absolutely GREAT feet. So, perhaps, there is a certain amount of conceit about my horse as well. I figure, if Saber couldn't have done it barefoot, then the horse that could do it barefoot doesn't exist. kat Orange County, Calif. :) =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Ridecamp is a service of Endurance Net, http://www.endurance.net. Information, Policy, Disclaimer: http://www.endurance.net/Ridecamp Subscribe/Unsubscribe http://www.endurance.net/ridecamp/logon.asp Ride Long and Ride Safe!! =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
|