![]() |
RE: [RC] rider option - heidi larsonI'm not sure if that is completely true - at a ride this last fall, a rider came into the final vet check, (I was volunteering) I heard the rider was pulling, Rider Option, rider asked vet if he'd like to see the horse, brought horse up and I watched it limp to the vet, 3-legged lame. The ride results on AERC state Lameness/Rider Option. The horse was definitely NOT fit to continue. heidi larson --- "Susan E. Garlinghouse, DVM" <suendavid@xxxxxxx> wrote: The rider is only allowed a RO-L (or other varieties of RO) if the vet has examined the horse, deemed it fit to continue, and the rider wants to pull anyway because they think the horse doesn't feel quite right or whatever. If the vet thinks the horse is lame or metabolic, then the rider's opinion is irrelevant. The horse is lame and gets an L (or M), not an RO-L (or RO-M). The horse MUST be judged as fit to continue before any variety of RO is available. Susan Garlinghouse, DVM ____________________________________________________________________________________ Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now. http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Ridecamp is a service of Endurance Net, http://www.endurance.net. Information, Policy, Disclaimer: http://www.endurance.net/Ridecamp Subscribe/Unsubscribe http://www.endurance.net/ridecamp/logon.asp Ride Long and Ride Safe!! =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
|