[RC] wild horses vs. endangered species act - Lynn WhiteWhen it comes to sharing the range, the Endangered Species Act pretty much trumps everything else. That means if, say, the sage grouse goes on "The List" the habitat gets special protection. That means a limitation is put on the habitat regarding potential impact. This could mean anything from keeping cattle out of areas during the courtship/nesting times to complete exclusion of any human activity. The big picture here is to PREVENT species from being put on the list. That means volunteering to preserve habitat before it is mandated. Remember that there is no protocol on de-listing species, so habitat under protection is in limbo for perpetuity. For example, if you are managing a ride on BLM land, you may be told that you can't do it anymore if someone in an office determines that your activity COULD impact that habitat. And it doesn't matter if you have been putting on that ride consecutively for the past 50 years. So in essence, feral horses have just got to go if they are impacting habitat for a species that might be listed. Horses may have evolved here in North America, but they are not a natural part of the recent ecosystem and are considered a non-native species. It's just the way the act is interpreted. We all get myopic and romantic about wild horses and their fate but it's just the way things work, and I am afraid there is not a lot we can do about it. It's a small bean in the kettle and there are many other much bigger issues that require attention. Lynn =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Ridecamp is a service of Endurance Net, http://www.endurance.net. Information, Policy, Disclaimer: http://www.endurance.net/Ridecamp Subscribe/Unsubscribe http://www.endurance.net/ridecamp/logon.asp Ride Long and Ride Safe!! =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
|