RE: [RC] NASCAR vs Endurance - SusanThe parallels of endurance to NASCAR would be the very things we wouldn't want publicized on TV (of all places!). I enjoy watching any car race more in person and from the pits. That's where all the action is! Watching a well-trained pit crew is indeed entertaining. There isn't that kind of work in endurance...thankfully...I couldn't afford to pay a crew! So, entertainment from a pit crew is out. What other excitement would there be watching horses move around an oval 25 or 50 times? The "crashes"? "There's the race vet running to a downed horse!" Oh yes...let's please show that to the public! The very things that draws the public to NASCAR would either be non existent to endurance (pit crews)
or bad publicity (sick / injured horses). The excitement from public's perspective would be the race to the finish. Let's see...we've got the Triple Crown and a ba-zillion other flat-track races for that. Personally, if he is bound and determined to have a race like this, I'd rather him do it in his own state rather than Oklahoma. CATOOSA!! Sound familiar? (I LOVE Days of Thunder!!!) Ranelle Rubin <raneller@xxxxxxx> wrote: Great post Lynn...! Semper Obliquo (Always aside),
Susan Young, The Princess of Pink Your Independent Mary Kay Beauty Consultant
Glenndale Grace Farm, Ft Gibson, Oklahoma U.S.A. "Ride on! Rough-shod if need be, smooth-shod if that will do, but ride on! Ride on over all obstacles, and win the race!" - Charles Dickens (1812-1870)
|