To me, this sounds so rational…
Kathy
Diane wrote:
Instead of the ineffectual HPA legislation we are now stuck with, if you
really want to protect horses instead of just forcing your beliefs and
opinions down others throats, why not support a two-pronged attack on
this issue which will accomplish what you most desire - an improvement
in the quality of death for the horses. First, other posters made a
wonderfully sane suggestion: rescue groups could instigate the creation
of a nationwide network or organization dedicated to the gentle
euthanasia and dignified disposal of horses, one which would take ALL
horses brought to them and charge a reasonable fee for their services.
Clients could choose the method of death and disposal based on their
personal beliefs and/or pocketbooks. Second, support legislation
respecting the transport and slaughter of horses which would require
that horses be treated humanely, right up to and including the coup de
grace. No moral/religious underpinning, no distinction between horses
as food for people vs animals. Just protection for the horses from
inhumane treatment.
