Home Current News News Archive Shop/Advertise Ridecamp Classified Events Learn/AERC
Endurance.Net Home Ridecamp Archives
ridecamp@endurance.net
[Archives Index]   [Date Index]   [Thread Index]   [Author Index]   [Subject Index]

Re: [RC] Huh? - Truman Prevatt

Science is starting to understand the complex cellular communication that takes place. Why do cells do what they do when they do it and how do they communicate. It really got started when Candace Perth discovered the opiate receptor while at Hopkins. During her work she spent a lot of time in the physics/math departments trying to understand how we dealt and modeled the "spooky action at a distance" that some seem to think is part of quantum physics. Since my area at that time was the mathematics associated with quantum field theory I took great interest in her work. There are some amazing similarities between the way particles at the quantum level "communicate" and the way receptors communicate. In physics certain particles have been renamed to reflect this. The photon (particle of light) is know to be the messenger particle for the electromagnetic force. When two electrons repel one another for example they trade photons in the process to communicate the force. Same for when a proton and an electron attract. The strong nuclear force has it own messenger particle (gulon) as does the weak nuclear force which has two (Z and W bosons). Even gravity has its own - the graviton. While this all sounds absurd - many know phenomenon that were difficult to explain - became crystal clear. It just works to explain how the world works. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Graviton has a good lay discussion of the graviton and messenger particles. Perth popularized her work in lay terms in a book called "Molecules of Emotion." She I believe is at Georgetown Medical School now.

Perth basically paved the way to the understanding of many other types of receptors that regulate at the cellular level much of the workings of the body - which led to the discovery of more. They literally are the antenna's and information processors of the cell and their actions are becoming more and more important in the understanding of the regulation and control of the functions of the human body. In fact from what I remember most of the internal automatic control at he cellular level is thought now to be through a enzyme, peptide receptor mechanism. It's been awhile since I have followed the work in any detail - but the implications were fascinating. Much as the discovery of the messenger particles changed our thinking about physics - so it seems the discovery of the multitude of receptors have changed how microbiologist view the control at the cellular.

The reason for the statement below is just to point that we are just peeling yet another layer off our understand of how biological organisms function and how the control mechanisms work. We need not become locked into a narrow focused view of how to best determine the stresses on a horse or how the stresses will translate on a particular day. Our parameters we use today are pretty coarse and their ability to address what is going on to predict what might go awry is educated conjecture at best based more on experience than science. Of course we have to do something and these indicators is all we have at the present. However, I would rather we focus on how to better estimate the true state - for example hydration - than to push as coarse parameter such as pulse rate or even CRI past there limit of the information they convey. An unintended consequence in becoming more reliant on a fixed parameter is to minimize the reliance on other parameters which are as important - maybe more. At the end of the day the source of the best indicators is a good vet that has seen the horse multiple times and a rider that has been riding the horse for several years.

Tough problem, but I think we can do better. Fiddling with the pulse rate or recovery time (especially when it will impact a lot of other things) is not a silver bullet - we can do better and should be looking to do better.

Truman

Bruce Weary wrote:
Truman said:
" the role and impact of the various receptors that are key to the control process of the various systems. We are just starting to understand the role many of these and understand their ability to actually process information for directing the processes at the cell level."


What in THE hell does that mean? Dr Q


=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=


Ridecamp is a service of Endurance Net, http://www.endurance.net.
Information, Policy, Disclaimer: http://www.endurance.net/Ridecamp
Subscribe/Unsubscribe http://www.endurance.net/ridecamp/logon.asp

Ride Long and Ride Safe!!

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=





--

“He who fights with monsters might take care lest he thereby become a monster. And if you gaze for long into an abyss, the abyss gazes also into you.” Friedrich Nietzsche, Beyond Good and Evil


=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=


Ridecamp is a service of Endurance Net, http://www.endurance.net.
Information, Policy, Disclaimer: http://www.endurance.net/Ridecamp
Subscribe/Unsubscribe http://www.endurance.net/ridecamp/logon.asp

Ride Long and Ride Safe!!

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=


Replies
[RC] Huh?, Bruce Weary