 |
RE: [RC] 30 minute rule: my take - heidiJoe, this has been pretty well gone over, but will just say that
the veterinary committee and many very experienced ride veterinarians
do NOT think that the current system is "working well" and strongly
feel that this change would be an improvement.
Over the years, we have not had "hard, documented evidence" on any
of the other changes that have greatly improved the sport for our
horses, either--not for gates into holds, not for
"fit-to-continue," not for lowering pulse criteria below 72.
What we had was the input from ride veterinarians who saw horses in
trouble from the way we did things. They were right then--and
they are most likely right now.
We can decide that what we do is "enough" and quit making
progress--but I agree with you that we can still improve our horse
death rate. I would add that death is not the only negative
outcome of overriding our horses--such horses can continue to live, but
be metabolically compromised or suffer from exhaustion-related
illnesses. To me, those are not acceptable, either. We need
to continually strive to make the best better.
We heard all about the horrible consequences that would result from
making other changes that have benefitted the welfare of our
horses. Those horrible consequences didn't come to pass then, and
I really don't think they will come about if we make this change,
either. I am a firm believer in taking possible consequences into
account--but the benefits of this one far outweigh the
inconveniences.
I know no one will change your mind on this issue, but if there is
anyone who has missed this discussion so far, they need to be aware
that there is another side to the issue than the one that you have
presented.
Heidi
1. This change is unnecessary. The current system has stood the test
|