Re: [RC] [RC] A Much Better Proposal - Nancy MittsThe incentive would be to "prove" their horse was just fine after all, and the AERC rule was hogwash. Nobody thinks 'they' are the abusive ones, it's just people picking on them.Trust me, I've spent the last 2 years hanging around camp/vet checks, I can hear it now. And, although most of us will not admit it, there is sometimes truth in that. People who are not well liked, or who do things "differently" are judged more harshly by the peanut gallery when something goes wrong. (Vets are usually pretty fair, which can also cause quite a rumble from the peanut gallery.) There is also the issue that some vets really are stricter than others, and a lot of vets get sick of hearing riders whine. You'll end up having riders being "set down" who have had rather minor problems. Others will be let go or allowed a RO just because the vet or RM was intimidated or doesn't believe in the punishment. Nancy Mitts From: Truman Prevatt <tprevatt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> _________________________________________________________________ Communicate instantly! Use your Hotmail address to sign into Windows Live Messenger now. http://get.live.com/messenger/overview =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Ridecamp is a service of Endurance Net, http://www.endurance.net. Information, Policy, Disclaimer: http://www.endurance.net/Ridecamp Subscribe/Unsubscribe http://www.endurance.net/ridecamp/logon.asp Ride Long and Ride Safe!! =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
|