Home Current News News Archive Shop/Advertise Ridecamp Classified Events Learn/AERC
Endurance.Net Home Ridecamp Archives
ridecamp@endurance.net
[Archives Index]   [Date Index]   [Thread Index]   [Author Index]   [Subject Index]

Re: [RC] Recovery/CRI - k s swigart

From: <heidi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

In other words, kat, yes, the horse with the 80/80 CRI
did have a problem.  In fact, two problems.  Both were
thankfully easily alleviated.  Perhaps "the horse has a problem"
would be more accurate phraseology than "the horse is in
trouble," but you illustrate my point--SOMETHING is not
right with the horse with the 80 pulse, even if his CRI is 80/80.

True, but the "problem" that the horse had had absolutely NOTHING to do
with the fact that it hadn't "recovered" from the effort of the
endurance ride.  He probably would have had the hanging pulse of 80 and
the CRI of 80/80 had he stood tied to the trailer or out in a pasture
with all those biting flies. And standing there for another two hours or
four hours would have made no difference.

A hanging pulse of 80 tells you virtually NOTHING about the extent to
which a horse has "recovered" from an endurance ride.  The CRI of 80/80
tells you that "recovery" is NOT the horse's problem.

In my experience, using absolute heart rates for determining the extent
of recovery is both narrow minded and foolish.

As an example, last year at the Cold Springs ride, when I was at the 50
mile vet check I was slightly dehydrated and under fuelled (i.e. low
blood sugar).  Consequently, my blood pressure was low and I was light
headed.  When I sat down (after taking care of and vetting through my
horse) to have a bite to eat and to drink as much as I could, I took MY
heart rate.  It was 36.  My normal resting heart rate is about 44.

Both of these numbers are really low.  If they were observed in a horse,
one might be tempted to think, wow, look at how well that horse has
recovered.  However, in ME, that 36 HR was a RED FLAG and it was an
indication that I had neither eaten nor drunk enough on my excursion
through the desert to that point.  I had not "recovered" I had over
exerted myself without proper care and attention to food and water.
After resting for a bit, I my HR may have crept back up to normal over
time, and it would have gone up if I got up and ran around (in fact it
would have gone up dramatically had I done so or been subjected to a
CRI); however, what I really needed was water, sugar and electrolytes
(fruit juice and potato chips is what I usually use for thisin the short
term; however, I also made a point to eat a good lunch before going out
again).

In this case, it was the low HR that was the indication of the "trouble"
I was in.  However, a CRI on me would have shown something along the
lines of 40/80.

kat
Orange County, Calif.
:)



=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

Ridecamp is a service of Endurance Net, http://www.endurance.net.
Information, Policy, Disclaimer: http://www.endurance.net/Ridecamp
Subscribe/Unsubscribe http://www.endurance.net/ridecamp/logon.asp

Ride Long and Ride Safe!!

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=


Replies
RE: [RC] Recovery/CRI, heidi