[RC] re: crewless riders - Cindy CollinsI graciously, but adamantly, disagree, Truman. It is true that if you are permanently crewless and are not a self-sufficient type of person, then you certainly want to avoid rides where it is "difficult to ride crewless." However to say that everyone should avoid those rides just continues us down a sad path where the only rides left will be ones where horses are in box stalls, meals are catered, big prizes abound, trails are in loops with easy terrain and easy access, etc. In other words, all of the things some of us hate about the evolution of the sport in recent years. That is NOT to say that I don't enjoy those amenities when they come around. It does mean that we would lose something very precious if that's what we require at all rides. All of your other suggestions are excellent. I am sure that you could ride Tevis or BH crewless, but many people could not and would not (and those are two extremes in the sport as far as volunteers and expectations). However, I would never say we should avoid those rides. We just need to plan accordingly when we attend rides that take a bit of self reliance and we need to keep our expectations in line with the realities of the terrain. Truman said: And finally - if the ride doesn't support crewless riders then that is the last time you should support that ride. Voting with your feet is a very good way to get your point across. Truman Cindy Collins c_collins@xxxxxxx =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Ridecamp is a service of Endurance Net, http://www.endurance.net. Information, Policy, Disclaimer: http://www.endurance.net/Ridecamp Subscribe/Unsubscribe http://www.endurance.net/ridecamp/logon.asp Ride Long and Ride Safe!! =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
|