RE: [RC] selling off national forest lands - Jim Holland
EXACTLY! That’s why it’s
a bad idea and sets a dangerous precedent. So when that money runs out, we sell
some more acres, etc, ad infinitum until all the lands are gone…or until
we balance the budget? Don’t hold your breath…
Only explanation I can think of is that
the Bush administration hopes that when THAT happens, it will not be on their
watch! I assume someone consulted a “higher power” on this
decision as well. <sigh>
From: Maryanne Gabbani
[mailto:msgabbani@xxxxxxx] Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2006
4:08 PM To: rdcarrie@xxxxxxx Cc: Jim Holland; Ridecamp Subject: Re: [RC] selling off
national forest lands
I have a dumb question about this idea. If a land sale is to replace
another form of income for schools, what happens when the money runs out and
the land is gone? Doesn't make any sense to me.
Secure
RuralSchools
and Community Self-Determination Act, expires Sept. 30."
Selling the land outright results in the FS having less land
parcels for negotiating with landowners to acquire larger contiguous areas and
increase green spaces. >>