RE: [RC] Pilot Error - David LeBlancKat said: The pilot's in-flight loss of control during liftoff DUE TO HIS IMPROPER PLANNING AND DECISIONS. That's what they always chalk them up to, unless there's a clear mechanical failure. It's kind a macabre joke in much of the aircraft circles - that's basically the default answer when there isn't any other clear answer. What's really interesting is how often aircraft end up getting upgrades and retrofits over accidents that were 'pilot error'. They basically don't really know why it did what it did - the thing obviously flew in just fine. I'm somewhat doubtful that another 150# or so tipped the aircraft over the edge, especially in that manner. Helicopters are just basically dangerous, even under the best of conditions. They're interesting machines - I studied them for a while getting my Master's in Aerospace. While I agree with your overall point that people ought to take responsibility for themselves, there is a point where stuff happens that may be within the control of someone with as much foresight as they have hindsight, but that's just not reality. There's an interesting read that I think is words to live by - http://yarchive.net/air/perfect_safety.html An excerpt: -------------- But, no matter what you do, it will never be perfectly, 100% risk-free to fly. Or to drive, or to walk, or to do anything. ... One of our engineers was walking his dog when a car driven by a kid jumped the curb and hit him. Only his leg was broken. But he walks his dog again, now. Who know better than him the danger? There's no way to make life perfectly safe; you can't get out of it alive. You can't even predict every danger. How can you guard against a hazard you can't even conceive of? -------------- Here's the quote that ends up all over the place: "Insisting on perfect safety is for people who don't have the balls to live in the real world." - Mary Schafer, NASA Flight Engineer So, I really just can't agree with you that every time a horse gets pulled, it's because of some fault of the rider. Most of the time, I'll buy - all of the time? That's not living in the real world. An aircraft is a _machine_, and I can do the math to predict what one will do under all sorts of conditions, but even after we've been flying for 100 years, they still surprise us. The fundamental equation that governs air flow can't be solved, though it can be approximated. A horse is far more complex in many respects, so expecting someone to be able to anticipate everything that can go wrong when we can't do this with machines just isn't living in the real world. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Ridecamp is a service of Endurance Net, http://www.endurance.net. Information, Policy, Disclaimer: http://www.endurance.net/Ridecamp Subscribe/Unsubscribe http://www.endurance.net/ridecamp/logon.asp Ride Long and Ride Safe!! =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
|